Lizzie Armitstead has cited incredibly difficult family circumstances as the reason behind her missing a third drugs test which put her participation at the Rio Olympics in jeopardy.The 27-year-old, who will feature in the road race on Sunday, said on Tuesday that she was naive in not challenging her first missed drugs test until the threat of a suspension loomed large.And in a further lengthy statement released on Wednesday, the English rider said that after missing two earlier tests, personal circumstances dictated that she missed a third in June -- an incident that put her participation in Rio in doubt before she was cleared by the Court of Arbitration for Sport.In a statement which tallied 1,275 words, she wrote: This is where I believe I have the right to privacy. My personal family circumstances at the time of the test were incredibly difficult. The medical evidence provided in my case was not contested by [UK Anti-Doping]. They accepted the circumstances I was in.UKAD did not perceive my situation to be extreme enough to alleviate me of a negligence charge. A psychiatrist assessment of my state of mind at the time was contrary.In my defence I was dealing with a traumatic time and I forgot to change a box on a form. I am not a robot, I am a member of a family -- my commitment to them comes over and above my commitment to cycling. This will not change and as a result I will not discuss this further. Our suffering does not need to be part of a public trial.I hope I have made it clear that family comes before cycling. I am not obsessively driven to success in cycling. I love my sport, but I would never cheat for it.Armitsteads statement in fullI am writing this statement in my own words, something I have wanted to do from the very beginning.Understandably people have questions which I want to answer as openly and honest as I can. I hope people understand that speaking with journalists is a necessary part of my job, speaking directly to the public in a statement like this, which has not been ghost written or moulded by somebody else is unheard of.I want to take responsibility for this message, this is my life and not a game of headlines. I want to state the facts but also try to explain my situation further. I believe I owe this statement to sports fans, people who love sport like I do.As an 18-year-old schoolgirl I was introduced to the whereabouts system, nine years ago. Since then the system has evolved and developed, post October 2015 I recognised this and requested further education from UKAD, I will come back to this later.By submitting my whereabouts I am consenting to people coming into my house or hotel and taking blood and urine samples. This is a part of my sport that I accept and wholeheartedly support. To add some background before I explain the specific details of my three strikes. I have been tested 16 times in 2016.I have a clear and valid blood passport (a more detailed use of looking for doping violations by looking for trends versus anomalies in my blood values). I have been tested after every victory this season. I am on the road for around 250 days a year, with around 60 race days. I have never tested positive for a banned substance. I have never taken a banned substance.I will present the facts of my three strikes.Sweden -- August 20, 2015:UKAD are allowed a maximum of two weeks to inform you of a strike. When I received the letter from UKAD I immediately contested it with a written explanation, this was not accepted on the eve of me travelling to America for my world championships. I had no legal advise or external support at the time.Last week [the] CAS ruled quickly and unanimously in my favour and cleared me of any wrong doing, because: I was at the hotel I stated. The DCO didnt do what was reasonable or necessary to find me. I was tested the next day, this test was negative. Calling an athletes mobile phone is not a method approved by UKAD to try and locate an athlete, as such it is not an argument against me that I slept with my phone on silent in order not to disturb a roommate.Put simply I was available and willing to provide a sample for UKAD.Second strike -- October 2015:Despite being reported as a missed test this was in fact a filing failure. UKAD did not try to test me, instead this was an administrative spot check. They found an inconsistency between an overnight accommodation and a morning time slot.A busy post world championship period meant I had no firm plans and as such was changing address and plans very quickly. I made a mistake. This was an honest mistake rather than trying to deceive anybody. A mistake that many athletes who are honest with themselves will admit to having made themselves. I was tested by UKAD later that week and produced a negative result.In December 2015, I met with UKAD and British cycling to discuss a support plan in order to avoid a third potential strike.Simon Thornton from British Cycling was put in place to check my whereabouts on a bi-weekly basis. We had regular contact and he would help me with any problems, effectively he was a fail-safe mechanism. Since meeting with UKAD my whereabouts updates have been as detailed and specific as they can possibly be. Going as far as I can in describing my locations to avoid any further issues. Unfortunately, this system fell apart on the June 9 when UKAD tried to test me in my hour slot and I was not where I had stated I would be.Simon Thornton had left [British Cycling] three weeks prior to my strike without anybody informing me. We worked under a policy of no news was good news as outlined in my support plan with UKAD.If Simon was still in place the following oversight could have been prevented. My overnight accommodation (the bed in which I was sleeping the morning of the test) was correct, but I had failed to change the one hour testing slot, it was clearly impossible to be in both locations.This is where I believe I have the right to privacy. My personal family circumstances at the time of the test were incredibly difficult, the medical evidence provided in my case was not contested by UKAD, they accepted the circumstances I was in.UKAD did not perceive my situation to be extreme enough to alleviate me of a negligence charge. A psychiatrist assessment of my state of mind at the time was contrary. In my defence I was dealing with a traumatic time and I forgot to change a box on a form.I am not a robot, I am a member of a family, my commitment to them comes over and above my commitment to cycling. This will not change and as a result I will not discuss this further, our suffering does not need to be part of a public trial.I hope I have made it clear that family comes before cycling, I am not obsessively driven to success in cycling, I love my sport, but I would never cheat for it.To conclude:I currently have one filing failure and one missed test.The reason this hasnt been discussed publicly until now is because I had the right to a fair trial at CAS, it is clear sensationalised headlines have a detrimental effect to any legal case.In the days following the revelations in the press my family and I have been the victim of some incredibly painful comments.I ask people to take a moment to put themselves in my shoes, I am an athlete trying to do my best, I am a clean athlete. I am the female road race world champion, I operate in a completely different environment to the majority of athletes in the testing pool.I am self coached, I work outside British Cycling and its systems, I race for a womens team that doesnt have a budget to match a world tour mens team who have staff specifically in place to supports riders with whereabouts.I dont wish to make excuses, I made one mistake which was noticed in a spot check my second strike came at a time when anybody who lives for and loves their family would understand my oversight. Its as simple as ticking the wrong box on a form.I love sport and the values it represents, it hurts me to consider anybody questioning my performances. Integrity is something I strive for in every part of my life. I will hold my head high in Rio and do my best for Great Britain.I am sorry for causing anyone to lose faith in sport, I am an example of what hard work and dedication can achieve. I hate dopers and what they have done to sport.To any of the Twitter Army reading this, do yourself a favour and go for a bike ride. Its the most beautiful thing you can do to clear your mind. Curt Schilling Jersey .J. -- Marty Brodeur beat the Pittsburgh Penguins yet again. Nick Ahmed Jersey . Dusautoir, the former World Player of the Year, sustained a torn bicep playing for Toulouse in the Heineken Cup on Saturday. The flanker, who has played 65 times for France, is expected to be out for up to four months. http://www.authenticdiamondbacksproshop.com/diamondbacks-chris-owings-jersey/ . If ever they start actually putting pictures beside words in the dictionary, the Blue Jays left-handers mug will appear beside “Consistency. Shelby Miller Jersey . I cant pinpoint a date, but I do remember a player from my youth. Brian Downing was with the Chicago White Sox at a time when I listened to every game I possibly could on the radio. That particular season the late great Harry Caray was calling the White Sox games. Jorge De La Rosa Jersey . LOUIS -- St. SAN JOSE, Calif. -- Martin Jones came within 80 seconds of a shutout. Sometimes, thats the sort of stingy performance it takes to beat Canadiens goalie Carey Price.Brent Burns and Joe Pavelski scored in the first period, Jones stopped 31 shots and the San Jose Sharks extended their mastery of Montreal at home by beating the Canadiens 2-1 on Friday night in a matchup of division leaders.You know youre not going to score four or five goals on him, Jones said, referring to Price. You know youre going to have to play well. There are two teams out there. Its not just me and him. I thought we defended really well.Jones won his third straight and the Sharks improved to 8-0-2 against the Canadiens in San Jose since November 1999.Pavelski also had an assist, and Joe Thornton got two assists.Price was efficient after giving up the two early goals, one on a power play and the other on an odd-man rush. He finished with 28 saves for Montreal, and Andrew Lehkonen scored a power-play goal late in the third period.The Canadiens failed to maintain pressure against Jones, who turned away several point-blank shots early and then was rarely tested.He did his job, Pavelski said. He always does his job. He shows up. We have a lot of confidence in him, and he showed you why tonight. Guys did a good job in front of him, and it was a really good effort against a good team.The Atlantic Division leaders have gone consecutive games without earning a point for the first time this season. Meanwhile, the Pacific Division-leading Sharks have won three straight and six of seven.Montreals Alexander Radulov exited with 4:06 remaining after getting cut over the eye by Logan Couture, who was assessed a double minor for high-sticking.I was just gooing to the net and I think their guy was trying to protect the slot area and not let me in and its just part of the game, Radulov said, sporting a few stitches above his right eye.dddddddddddd. Scary, but its OK. He tried to lift my stick but I tried to jump in front of him and his stick went up because my stick was not there. Its just hockey.Montreal took advantage of the late penalty to get on the board when Lehkonen scored with a 6-on-4 advantage.Kind of an unlucky bounce there in front of the net that just kind of squeaked through my legs there, Jones said. But we killed really well tonight. We didnt let them get set up for the most part. Thats a good power play. Theyre going to get some chances.Burns scored his 10th goal, most among NHL defensemen, to put the Sharks ahead on the power play 5:22 into the game.That was probably more of a lucky one, Burns said. Shooting against Price, you know theres not many holes. Its good that one found its way back. I was swinging all night and none of the other ones went in.Thornton picked up a Canadiens turnover in the final minute of the first period and fed Pavelski in front of the net.Game notes Thornton has 1,356 points, 25th on the NHLs career list. ... Burns has eight points in his past seven games. ... The Canadiens are 0-7-2 in California since March 2014. ... The Canadiens have allowed 12 power-play goals in 38 chances to San Jose since 1999. ... Montreals past seven games have been decided by one goal.UP NEXTCanadiens: Continue their road trip at the Los Angeles Kings on Sunday.Sharks: Host the Ottawa Senators on Wednesday night. Wholesale HoodiesNFL Shirts OutletJerseys NFL WholesaleCheap NFL Jerseys Free ShippingWholesale Jerseys CheapCheap NFL Jerseys ChinaWholesale JerseysWholesale NFL JerseysCheap NFL Jerseys ChinaCheap NFL Jerseys ' ' '